In 2024, the department released a feasibility report on expanding the CBD Program. The report by KPMG titled ‘Expanding the Commercial Building Disclosure Program Feasibility of mandatory disclosure of energy ratings for most commercial buildings’ found that the CBD Program was performing well when compared with other programs internationally and, if expanded to other building types, could be a powerful tool in transitioning Australia’s commercial buildings to net zero. The KPMG report found that three policy options for expansion had significant merits, and that further cost benefit analysis and consultation on these options should be undertaken. The report included a suggested roadmap for introducing mandatory disclosure to most major commercial building sectors by 2035.  

Public consultation  

The department conducted public consultation on the expansion of the CBD Program between 14 June 2024 and 13 September 2024.  

The department received a total of 46 submissions. Submissions could be made by completing an online survey or providing a written submission. Respondents could provide public or private submissions.  

The following public submissions were made to the department:

The following documents were provided by the department for the consultation:  

You can find more information on the future expansion of the CBD Program here.  

The 2019 CBD Program review, conducted by the Centre for International Economics, examined whether the CBD Program: 

  • was effective in improving the energy efficiency of commercial office buildings 
  • should be expanded to other high energy use commercial building sectors. These include hotels, serviced apartments, office tenancies, data centres, and shopping centres. 

Due to the impacts of COVID-19 on the Australian economy the review was not finalised. 

Public consultation 

The draft report was published on this website and stakeholder workshops were held in October 2019: 

Read the Draft Report: Independent review of the Commercial Building Disclosure Program [PDF 2.7 MB] [DOCX 4.6 MB] 

Submissions on the draft report 

Submissions that weren’t marked confidential include: 

Previous consultation 

CIE released an issues paper in January 2019. 

Read the Issues Paper: Review of the Commercial Building Disclosure Program [PDF 537 KB] [DOCX 421 KB] 

Submissions on the issues paper 

Submissions that weren’t marked confidential include: 

In February 2016, the Australian Government released the report on the first independent review of Commercial Buildings Disclosure (CBD) Program. The review, produced by ACIL Allen Consulting, found the program to be a successful way of delivering significant benefits at a minimal cost to industry and government, achieving $44 million in benefits in its first four years.

The review also found that:

  • The Commercial Building Disclosure Program is an appropriate program that complements a suite of related government policies and programs, and should continue.
  • The CBD Program has been effective in inducing positive behavior change in relation to commercial building energy efficiency in affected buildings, resulting in significant benefits.
  • The CBD Program remains the principal Commonwealth Government program for driving energy efficiency improvements in the office sector.
  • The focus for the CBD program should remain on office buildings.

The review recommended lowering the threshold for mandatory disclosure of energy efficiency information on buildings from 2000m2 to 1000m2 to capture smaller office buildings. Stakeholders and the public were consulted about this, and the change was implemented on 1st July 2017.

The review also recommended extending the certification validity period for the energy efficiency office lighting assessment, known as a tenancy lighting assessment (TLA), from one to five years. This change was implemented on 1 September 2016. 

  • Download the CBD program review 2016 final report [PDF 1.7MB | DOCX 1.4MB]
  • Download the Regulation Impact Statement for the change in disclosure threshold recommended in the 2016 review [PDF 3.2 MB | DOCX 6.9MB]